Nuchal translucency of 3.0-3.4 mm an indication for NIPT or microarray? Cohort analysis and literature review

Introduction: Currently fetal nuchal translucency (NT) ≥3.5 mm is an indication for invasive testing often followed by chromosomal microarray. The aim of this study was to assess the risks for chromosomal aberrations in fetuses with an NT 3.0-3.4 mm, to determine whether invasive prenatal testing would be relevant in these cases and to assess the residual risks in fetuses with normal non-invasive prenatal test (NIPT) results. Material and methods: A retrospective study and meta-analysis of literature cases with NT between 3.0 and 3.4 mm and 2 cohorts of pregnant women referred for invasive testing and chromosomal microarray was performed: Rotterdam region (with a risk >1:200 and NT between 3.0 and 3.4 mm) tested in the period July 2012 to June 2019 and Central Denmark region (with a risk >1:300 and NT between 3.0 and 3.4 mm) tested between September 2015 and December 2018. Results: A total of 522 fetuses were referred for invasive testing and chromosomal microarray. Meta-analysis indicated that in 1:7.4 (13.5% [95% CI 8.2%-21.5%]) fetuses a chromosomal aberration was diagnosed. Of these aberrant cases, 47/68 (69%) involved trisomy 21, 18, and 13 and would potentially be detected by all NIPT approaches. The residual risk for missing a (sub)microscopic chromosome aberration depends on the NIPT approach and is highest if NIPT was performed only for common trisomies–1:21 (4.8% [95% CI 3.2%-7.3%]). However, it may be substantially lowered if a genome-wide 10-Mb resolution NIPT test was offered (~1:464). Conclusions: Based on these data, we suggest that the NT cut-off for invasive testing could be 3.0 mm (instead of 3.5 mm) because of the high risk of 1:7.4 for a chromosomal aberration. If women were offered NIPT first, there would be a significant diagnostic delay because all abnormal NIPT results need to be confirmed by diagnostic testing. If the woman had already received a normal NIPT result, the residual risk of 1:21 to 1:464 for chromosome aberrations other than common trisomies, dependent on the NIPT approach, should be raised. If a pregnant woman declines invasive testing, but still wants a test with a broader coverage of clinically significant conditions then the genome-wide >10-Mb resolution NIPT test, which detects most aberrations, could be proposed

Implementing NIPT as part of a national prenatal screening program: The Dutch TRIDENT studies

Objectives: In most countries, non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has been introduced commercially without any governmental guidance. In the Netherlands, prenatal screening for fetal anomaly is subject to a governmental license. NIPT has been implemented as part of the TRIDENT studies (Trial by Dutch laboratories for Evaluation of NIPT). TRIDENT-2 aims at offering NIPT to all pregnant women (∼174,000 women/year) within the national prenatal screening program. Since April 2017, women can choose NIPT as a contingent test after first-trimester combined testing (FCT), but may also choose NIPT as first-tier screening test. TheTRIDENT studies evaluate implementation and women's perspectives. Methods: All pregnant women in the Netherlands are offered prenatal screening and are counselled by certified counselors, generally midwives. A first-tier NIPT costs women € 175, comparable to the costs of FCT (∼€ 168). NIPT is performed by three Dutch university clinical genetic laboratories using an in-house validated test. Women can choose to have analysis of chromosomes 21, 18, and 13 without or with a report of incidental findings (findings other than trisomy 21, 13, 18) on the remaining autosomes, respectively, using the 'targeted' or 'whole genome' WISECONDOR pipeline. Sex chromosomes are not analyzed. Results: After 8 months of study, 48,234 tests have been performed (nationwide uptake of prenatal screening by NIPT as first-tier test was 40%), and 98.3% reports successfully issued. Failure rate was less than 2%. Mean turnaround time was 7 working days. 80% of women chose to have all autosomes analyzed. A total of 152 cases of T21 (0.3%), 32 cases of T18 (0.1%), 41 cases of T13 (0.1%), and 158 (0.3%) other chromosomal aberrations were found. First year results (and available follow-up) will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: The Netherlands are the first country where NIPT is incorporated as a first-line test into a governmentally supported and health care funded prenatal aneuploidy screening program. The incorporation of the test in a university hospital laboratory and clinical service guarantees appropriate counselling and allows for proper follow-up. This 3-year study aims to provide all necessary information for a successful introduction of NIPT within the Dutch National prenatal screening program

Clinical impact of additional findings detected by genome-wide non-invasive prenatal testing: Follow-up results of the TRIDENT-2 study

In the TRIDENT-2 study, all pregnant women in the Netherlands are offered genome-wide non-invasive prenatal testing (GW-NIPT) with a choice of receiving either full screening or screening solely for common trisomies. Previous data showed that GW-NIPT can reliably detect common trisomies in the general obstetric population and that this test can also detect other chromosomal abnormalities (additional findings). However, evidence regarding the clinical impact of screening for additional findings is lacking. Therefore, we present follow-up results of the TRIDENT-2 study to determine this clinical impact based on the laboratory and perinatal outcomes of cases with additional findings. Between April 2017 and April 2019, additional findings were detected in 402/110,739 pregnancies (0.36%). For 358 cases, the origin was proven to be either fetal (n = 79; 22.1%), (assumed) confined placental mosaicism (CPM) (n = 189; 52.8%), or maternal (n = 90; 25.1%). For the remaining 44 (10.9%), the origin of the aberration could not be determined. Most fetal chromosomal aberrations were pathogenic and associated with severe clinical phenotypes (61/79; 77.2%). For CPM cases, occurrence of pre-eclampsia (8.5% [16/189] vs 0.5% [754/159,924]; RR 18.5), and birth weight <2.3rd percentile (13.6% [24/177] vs 2.5% [3,892/155,491]; RR 5.5) were significantly increased compared to the general obstetric population. Of the 90 maternal findings, 12 (13.3%) were malignancies and 32 (35.6%) (mosaic) pathogenic copy number variants, mostly associated with mild or no clinical phenotypes. Data from this large cohort study provide crucial information for deciding if and how to implement GW-NIPT in screening programs. Additionally, these data can inform the challenging interpretation, counseling, and follow-up of additional findings